Ellen Haroutunian is a writer, counselor, theologian and deep thinker, living and working in the Denver area. You can read more of Ellen’s thoughts at her blog.
Read Seeking the New Feminists, Part 1 here.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Seeking the New Feminists, Part 2: The Necessary Other
In her book In a Different Voice, psychologist Carol Gilligan reflects on the reality that woman often subdue themselves for the sake of maintaining peace in relationships. We counselors might be tempted to label that phenomenon unhealthy codependence. Instead, Gilligan feels this is part of the larger struggle of being female in this world. She asserts that relationships require “courage and emotional stamina which has long been a strength of women,” but also laments, “by restricting their voices women are wittingly or unwittingly perpetuating a male-voiced civilization and an order of living that is founded on disconnection from women.” In a world in which the human experience is seen as valid only through the eyes of the privileged few (mostly male), feminine values, experiences, and ideas remain unheard and ineffectual.
I believe the whole world suffers as a result.
Gilligan says that while the stream of this male- based culture often leaves out women, women often leave out themselves. One of the greatest hindrances to the flourishing of the female person may be our own selves. While men define themselves and the human experience separate from women (making the false assumption that if they know themselves, they know women), women often “create that separation within their own selves as an inner division or a psychic split”. All that fancy language means that we women often cut ourselves off from our own experience of reality, in order to submit to the reality of another. In this way society becomes lopsided, exclusive, advantageous to only a few.
It is important to reflect upon this disconnect that is experienced by woman, which is often voiced to me by some of my clients as a lack of confidence, or even as sheer self-contempt. According to Gilligan, psychology has observed that men are about setting boundaries, marking territory, and defining themselves as separate from women. Women, on the other hand, are more about connectedness; therefore the problem with relationships, indeed society in general, is perceived as the inability of women to become separate individuals. Man is seen as the norm and woman as the deviant. In a world of complex problems and violence, her voice is heard to be either a frivolous nicety or simply irrelevant. This can truly be a problem in the case of severe codependence, in which a woman has no sense of herself apart from others. But in the interest of building truly healthy communities, as well as flourishing as human beings in this postmodern age, perhaps recovering and releasing a woman’s sense of relational connectedness is what is most needed today.
Wise writer Lilian Calles Barger describes the many influences that have helped foster this internal split in women, causing us to mistrust our own voices and influence. Our modern, western culture has been profoundly shaped and influenced by the extremely misogynistic Greco-Roman culture. In their eyes, the female body was considered base and utilitarian. It was even thought to be a punishment for those who lived within it! This belief was reflected in her treatment within society. Her testimony was worth little in court. She had virtually no right to property. A woman was thought to represent the baser elements of existence; her body and its functions tied her to this earth. Maleness, on the other hand, was thought to represent the soul and higher spirituality. Woman was seen as deformed, less perfect than man. She was less human. This view of woman still subtly creeps into our modern psyches.
In addition, the modern notion of Descartes’ “I think, therefore I am” philosophy puts the understanding of “self” in the mind alone, disconnecting us from our bodies. As a result, Barger notes, we’ve come to understand the body as something apart from the true self. A body is seen as only matter, only sex, only an object that may set us up for shame (if appearance does not conform to cultural standards of beauty) or violence (because of being viewed as a tool for sexual performance), and may lead us to try transcending the body altogether, subduing and or perhaps exploiting its frailties and passions.
These core beliefs pull us out of what Barger describes as the nowness of our bodies. I remember the sudden shock of slamming cars on an icy highway when my children were small enough to be strapped into car seats. Our car spun around and off of the highway into a ditch. I was very aware of the nowness of being in my physical body, as I stepped into the biting chill, feeling both vulnerable and strong, trusting its intuition and power as I carried both of my little ones up a steep embankment blanketed in snow to avoid the other cars that were slipping and sliding all around us. It was a sharp contrast to how often I can live in battle with my body, mistrusting or even resenting its vast imperfections.
In my last article I reflected on unattainable body shapes and how they impact our self-understanding and how we live in our bodies. Any pressure around what the female body should be can be frightening and shaming, causing us to view our bodies as a problem, not a welcoming home and a source of deep beauty and world-healing wisdom. This ambivalence about the female body is a major factor in our own abdication of ourselves, our reluctance to show up in the world with a strong female voice, not merely as a person of opposition but as a necessary other, that all may learn and be enriched.
Barger charges that even the pursuit of freedom through the control of the body perpetuates a sense of detachment because of the belief that the body is something that can be managed and fixed. She notes for example, that with increasing reproductive control, doors have opened for women in the corporate and academic worlds because there is less fear she will become pregnant and drop out. The norm is the male journey, since he can pursue these things without disruption. Woman must pursue the male route in life in order to enjoy the same freedoms and privileges. This puts us in a paradoxical bind, says Barger, “Woman and person not being the same thing, a woman needs the pill to safeguard her personhood.” Therefore, could this attitude reveal an underlying misogyny about our own bodies?
Contraception now presumes that a woman can offer full access to her body for sex, ignoring rhythms and changes, and any “problems” that arise. Because of this, Barger says, both men and women can engage in sex without bringing a whole self to the relationship. Contraceptives also “change the sexual dialogue by diminishing partners’ sense of the importance of trust needed for intimacy” and [that] makes it “easier for both men and women to ignore the emotional backdrop to the sexual act.” In pursuing what looks like freedom, we may have split off from a connection with our own being, our emotional and spiritual selves, our unique and special femaleness.
The ambivalence in both men and women about our ability to conceive and bring forth life is still reflected in the power struggle surrounding the management of birth. Birth has been so increasingly medicalized that Barger says it is often treated “like a disease or a traffic accident.” And she adds, the high incidence of caesarians demonstrates that women are increasingly disconnected from their own birthing process. I just read yet another story about a breastfeeding mother who was refused passage on an airplane, reflecting the ongoing contradiction in American thought that it is acceptable to use breasts to sell beer, but not to nourish a baby. Because of incidents such as these Barger remarks that our “entire reproductive lifecycle has been marginalized.”
Let me be clear that I have no desire to create guilt over the use of contraceptives, nor do I condemn their use. Neither is this meant to be a polemic about abortion as a means of freedom from biological constraints. Black and white rule-making rarely serves anyone well. Case in point, look at the religious restrictions on many African woman which forbids the use of condoms that could protect them from AIDS, even as cultural constraints do not allow them to refuse sex with a philandering husband. This has contributed to the skyrocketing incidence of AIDS infections in women of childbearing age on that continent. And I admit, the Duggars (the family on reality TV with 19 children at last count) truly freak me out. While there’s beauty in the birth of each of those children, there is also an over-literal understanding of what it may mean to bear fruit for the sake of the larger community.
I think women need to pause and reflect upon the implications of redefining ourselves and our bodies in light of the male experience of life. To what degree have we lost ourselves and therefore the power of our unique female voices in this world? What do the rhythms and life-giving power of the female body and related experiences have to say to a hurting world? What messages can it give to the blossoming teenaged girl whose primary tutoring regarding her body comes from western media?
Reconnection with our bodies and all that they teach us is crucial to personal wholeness and the healthy female self, the necessary other in a world of ins and outs. I believe we long for wholeness in ourselves, selves fully at home in our own skins, fully embracing the female experience and the feminine values that have been forgotten or marginalized. Feminine values are things like the simple rhythms of life reflected by our own body cycles, marking a time for love, a time for autonomy; a time to reap, and a time to sow, a time for birth and a time for death. They include embracing the art of waiting, as the mysteries of life form outside of our line of sight and beyond our control (such as in a dark womb), moving us from the realm of mere reason into larger spiritual and intuitive realities. They call forth a whole self, fully present in the strength of relational connectedness making unapologetic requests and requirements upon the empowered other, so that they may be transformed as well.
A woman literally makes space within herself for new life to form. Making space for the other is a value that is desperately needed in this increasingly disparate and dangerous world. Embracing our full female bodied selves may be the greatest form of resistance to a world in which there is less and less space for the other, for anyone who differs, where violence, greed and too rigid boundaries threaten to implode our societies. Woman must reclaim her nature simply to Be and to show up just as we are, throwing off constricting definitions of beauty and worth that squeeze the life from us, as Amber Lane artfully describes her essay, Barbie and the Boa. And as Lilian Calles Barger says, the ongoing human conversation about “separation and connection, justice and care, rights and responsibilities, power and love” can take on new dimensions when women reunite with themselves fully, with voice and body fully embraced. Living comfortably within our own skin means we can extend embrace to the bodily existence of the other, all others, seeing more in them and not less, perhaps to change the way they view themselves and this world we live in.
For Further Reading:
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, by Carol Gilligan
Eve’s Revenge: Women and a Spirituality of the Body, by Lilian Calles Barger
article by ellen haroutunian, all rights reserved
back to voca femina home